AERIEL // PEOPLE & GOVERNANCE // LEGAL & ETHICS // EVIDENCE & ADMISSIBILITY
COUNSEL ON WATCH ·
Binding Instrument · Evidence Standards

AE-LEG-0011 — Evidence & Admissibility

The strongest blow the League strikes is proof. Evidence collected outside the law must be cleaner than evidence collected within it, because it will be doubted harder. This instrument sets the standard a package must meet before the League will stake its name — or anyone's liberty — on it.

Doc Control AE-LEG-0011 Revision A Effective 2091-02-09 Owner Legal & Ethics Approver Counsel Next Review 2092-02-09 Classification RESTRICTED // TIDEWATER-EYES-ONLY
The doctrine of clean hands. A package the League cannot stand behind in daylight is a package the League does not use. Evidence over force is not a slogan; it is the whole theory of victory. We win by making the truth undeniable, not by making it convenient.

1. Purpose & Scope

1.1. This instrument defines what makes a League evidence package hold — admissible where it will be tested, credible where it will be reported, and beyond impeachment where it will be doubted. It governs all collection conducted under the Intervention Doctrine, from a single photograph at Observe to a seized ledger at Direct Action.

1.2. Two distinct uses are served, and they hold to different standards (§5): formal use in a cooperating jurisdiction, and non-judicial use by a regulator or the press. A package built to the higher standard serves both; a package built only to the lower one is never elevated to the higher.

2. The Four Pillars

2.1. Every package rests on four pillars. A package missing any pillar is graded INADMISSIBLE for formal use regardless of how compelling its content.

3. Chain of Custody

3.1. Custody opens at the instant of collection — not at handover, not at port. Each transfer is logged with collector, receiver, time, hash (for digital media), and seal state (for physical samples). Per the collection SOP, custody is opened on the same form that authorises the operation.

3.2. Digital media is hashed at capture on the collecting device; the hash is the exhibit's fingerprint and any later copy is verified against it. Physical samples are sealed, split where possible into a working portion and a retained portion, and the retained portion is never opened except under independent observation.

A single gap voids the chain. One unaccounted-for hour, one unsigned transfer, one re-sealed bag is enough for a captured court — or a hostile newsroom — to throw the whole package out. Custody discipline is not bureaucracy; it is the difference between an exposé and a libel suit.

4. Independent Re-Test & Non-Contamination

4.1. The League's own analysis is never the last word. Every claim the League will assert publicly must be reproducible by an independent laboratory or expert from the retained sample or original medium. Where re-test is impossible (a fleeting event), the package is downgraded to corroborative and must be paired with an independently-verifiable element (AIS track, satellite pass, third-party witness).

4.2. Non-contamination is absolute. No member stages a scene, plants gear, edits media beyond disclosed format conversion, or omits exculpatory facts. A package found to be contaminated is destroyed, the operation is reported under AE-LEG-0013, and the responsible member is removed from collection duty. The League's credibility is a single-use asset; one staged scene poisons every true one.

5. Admissibility Standards by Use

StandardCooperating Jurisdiction (formal)Regulator / RFMO referralPress / public release
Chain of custodyMandatory, unbrokenMandatoryDocumented to source
Independent re-testRequired for every claimRequired for scientific claimsCorroboration sufficient
Collector identity disclosedTo court under protectionAggregated / shieldedAnonymous permitted
Method provenanceLawful-acquisition showingNeed-to-knowWithheld
Tolerance for League-acquired exhibitsLow — fruit-of-the-tree riskModerateHigh (with caveat)
The contamination doctrine. Where a member's conduct could taint a formal prosecution (fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree), the package is routed to regulator or press use only, and the League's involvement is firewalled from any cooperating prosecutor. We would rather lose a conviction than launder a tainted case into a courtroom in our name.

6. Provenance, Deniability & Member Protection

6.1. The League discloses collection method only to the degree the intended use requires (§5). Members are shielded by default; identities surface only under court protection and only where the member consents and Counsel certifies the protection is real. No package is built in a way that forces a member to choose between the case and their safety.

6.2. Where formal use would require exposing methods or members beyond what the jurisdictional analysis (AE-LEG-0014) makes safe, the package is held to non-judicial use. Deniability is a protection for people, not a tool for deception — it is never used to conceal a fact from the body the evidence is offered to.

7. Cross-References

7.1. Collection and handover procedures are specified in the operational SOPs. This instrument sets the standard; the SOPs set the steps.

8. Revision History

RevDateAuthorSummary of ChangeApproved
A2091-02-09CounselInitial issue: four pillars, use-graded admissibility, contamination doctrine.Counsel