AERIEL // MARINE SCIENCE // RESEARCH LOGS // RL-2090-018
SCIENCE ARM ONLINE ·
Research Log · Restoration Genetics · RL-2090-018

Heat-Tolerant Coral Genotype Selection & Outplant Survival

Selection of thermally resilient Acropora cervicornis genotypes by standardized thermal-stress assay, and the survival of nursery outplants across a Category-2 marine heatwave on a degraded fore-reef.

Restoration Genetics Active Method: CBASS thermal assay + outplant

Abstract

Coral restoration that ignores thermal tolerance plants reefs that the next summer kills. We screened 64 wild Acropora cervicornis genotypes from a surviving relict thicket using a standardized acute heat-stress assay (CBASS) and ranked them by the thermal threshold at which photochemical efficiency collapses (ED50 of Fv/Fm). The 18 top-ranked genotypes were propagated in the AERIEL midwater nursery and outplanted alongside an unselected reference set onto a degraded fore-reef. Across the following austral summer the site experienced 6.8 Degree-Heating-Weeks — a Category-2 bleaching event. At twelve months, heat-selected outplants showed 81% survival versus 43% for the unselected reference, a partitioning driven almost entirely by the selected corals' higher bleaching threshold rather than by growth rate. We conclude that ED50 pre-screening is a cheap, high-leverage filter for restoration stock, and we have promoted the assay to standard practice for the program.

Background & Question

The relict thicket designated as the parent source (registry AE-SPX-0004 · Staghorn Coral) is one of the last self-recruiting A. cervicornis stands in its basin: it persisted through two bleaching events that erased the surrounding reef. That persistence implied standing genetic variation in thermal tolerance worth harvesting. The operational question was blunt: does selecting outplant stock on a lab thermal threshold actually buy field survival through a real heatwave, and by how much? If the effect is large, restoration must screen before it plants; if it is marginal, the assay cost is not justified. We pre-registered a survival difference of ≥20 percentage points as the threshold for adopting screening as policy.

Methods

Findings

ED50 ranged from 34.6 °C to 37.1 °C across the 64 genotypes — a 2.5 °C spread within a single thicket, confirming exploitable standing variation. Field outcomes tracked the lab ranking. After the 6.8-DHW summer, heat-selected outplants survived at more than 1.8× the rate of the reference, and the survival hazard was cut by 64% (Cox HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.27–0.48, p<0.001). Notably, the selected and reference corals grew at statistically indistinguishable rates — the benefit was survival under heat, not vigor, which lays to rest the common worry that thermal tolerance trades off against growth in this species.

Selected Survival (12 mo)81%270 outplants
Reference Survival43%270 outplants
Mortality Hazard−64%Cox HR 0.36
CohortMean ED50Bleached at peak DHWSurvival 6 moSurvival 12 mo
Heat-selected (top 18)36.7 °C22%89%81%
Unselected reference35.1 °C71%58%43%
Difference+1.6 °C−49 pts+31 pts+38 pts
Selected-cohort survival · % · monthly across the heatwave summer

Implications

This is the cheapest large-effect intervention in the restoration toolkit: a one-week assay roughly doubles the odds that an outplant survives the climate it is planted into. We have promoted CBASS pre-screening to a mandatory gate in nursery intake, and the 18 high-ED50 genotypes are now archived as a heat-tolerant broodstock line in the Marine Genebank with cryo-preserved sperm backup. For the mission, resilient reef is not only ecology — a recovering fore-reef restores fish biomass that anchors the legal-fishery argument the League uses to contest industrial encroachment. Restoration that survives is restoration that becomes evidence.

References & Linked Records

Imaging note. Visual record pending generation. Art-direction prompt on file: “A diver in AERIEL gear epoxying a bright staghorn coral fragment onto a pale, degraded fore-reef, midwater coral-tree nursery structures visible behind, clear turquoise water, dappled sunlight, documentary marine-science photography.”
← Back to research logs